Previous Episode | Next Episode

self
There are, at one of the big regional shopping malls in the greater Portland area, two "quick casual" franchises located next to one another. As it turns out, I stopped into both of them earlier this evening and came away with such sharply contrasting experiences that I can't resist sharing. So:

First operation: mildly busy, as I might expect earlyish on a Friday evening. I enter, peruse the menu, and approach the counter to order.

The girl at the counter pulls a pen and a receipt pad (yes, an office/retail receipt pad, not a restaurant-style order pad), and explains that their computers are down, so they're taking down all the orders by hand. That's fine, I say. Then the girl supplies the kicker, sounding regretful but sincere: "and there'll be a wait of maybe half an hour, will that be all right?"

I blink, and am sufficiently boggled that my question comes out wrong. "The computer slows you down that much?"

"No," the girl explains, still sincere and apologetic, "the computer's *down*, so we don't have any way to communicate with the kitchen. When it's working, what we punch into the register goes straight back to the kitchen."

I blink again, because this operation has a semi-open kitchen -- I can see cooks in the work area behind the order counter, a mere few steps from the cash register, cooking people's dinners. And while the restaurant is far from empty, it's nowhere near full, and there's not a long line at the counter.

I consider possible responses. Should I rant angrily? No; escalating the situation isn't likely to solve the problem. Should I try to explain how cavemen short-order waiters and line cooks do this sort of thing all the time without computers, much faster than half an hour per order? No; from the conversation so far, I can tell that there isn't a clue-bat big enough to get that point across. Also, I'm hungry....

So I excuse myself politely, and go next door to the other franchise. Where I peruse the menu, order at the counter, and receive a vibro-pager; "this will go off when your order's ready; you can pick it up at the next counter down". As I finish paying for the meal, the vibro-pager goes off.

"Whoa," I say, collecting my beverage cup and strolling down to the pickup counter -- where the server is dishing up my soup as she explains that they're out of the bread they normally use for my sandwich, and tells me what she does have available. I pick an alternate, and they promise to bring the sandwich out to my table, since the vibro-pager has already done its thing. "We'll find you", the girl says. And they do, almost before I've finished arranging my soup and drink. The contrast is remarkable; at the second restaurant, everyone's communicating using *both* technology and traditional methods, and the service even when they're addressing a problem is admirably efficient.

I'm not naming either chain here; franchises can vary widely in their levels of cluefulness within a given chain, so it wouldn't be fair to either to generalize upward from my experiences. I'm just fascinated at the juxtaposition of critical clue-failure and plain common sense in the present instance.

Comments

( 6 comments — Agree, disagree, kibitz )
martianmooncrab
Oct. 27th, 2012 08:51 am (UTC)
I thinking mall with a food court?
djonn
Oct. 28th, 2012 04:20 am (UTC)
True...but misleading.
snippy
Oct. 27th, 2012 02:59 pm (UTC)
At the mall nearest me, most of the interesting food options are not in the mall at all. They're in two weird extensions of the mall, part of the parking lot that was built onto, as if the large indoor mall had given birth to two strip malls. You have to go outside and walk past the exteriors of the larger stores to get to them, and because they are on a raised part of the parking lot, there are long outdoor escalators (really? in our weather this seemed like a good idea?) if you approach from the main floor level of the mall. Of course if you walk out on the third floor of Macy's, you can get to each extension without needing stairs or other elevation change help.
djonn
Oct. 28th, 2012 04:34 am (UTC)
Been there, wondered as well about the designers' justification for that setup.

Mind, then you have the two newest retail centers in the region (Bridgeport Village & Streets of Tanasbourne), both designed as car-unfriendly "maze of twisty little streets" outdoor plaza centers...with major stores featuring bulky big-ticket items.

One admires the execution -- they're both visually comfortable, I think -- but definitely has to wonder what they were thinking in Oregon.
snippy
Oct. 29th, 2012 04:37 pm (UTC)
I think it's part of the "force people out of cars so we can be more like NYC and Europe" planning scheme. You're supposed to pay someone else (maybe even a cargo delivery bike -- have you seen those?) to deliver that stuff to your tiny studio in a high rise, not drive your SUV to the mall and bring it home yourself!
thnidu
Oct. 28th, 2012 01:35 am (UTC)
(blink) (blink)

I probably wouldn't've had the wisdom and restraint to just leave the first one quietly. I... still can't... well, yes, I believe it. But...

(music: Leslie Fish, "Ship of Stone" by Kathy Mar, on "Avalon is Risen")
( 6 comments — Agree, disagree, kibitz )

Confucius Say....

"I am totally a folklore pirate. Ahoy, mateys! Slow down your fairy tale and prepare to be boarded!"

-- Seanan McGuire

Latest Month

August 2014
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow